Best Asics Women’s Pickleball Shoes (2023): My Top 5 Recommendations
| PRODUCT | BEST FOR | PROS | CONS | PRICE #1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASICS Women’s Gel-RENMA Pickleball Shoes |
Casual pickleball players seeking comfort, support, and style for enhanced gameplay and court activities. | – Classic Look and Comfort – Supportive Profile – Game Improvement – Appealing Aesthetics – Positive Performance – No Break-in Required – Arch Support – Lightweight and Stylish |
– Narrow Toe Box – Inadequate Flexibility – Premature Wear – Sizing Issues – Limited Durability – Unsuitable for Wide Feet – Stiffness and Discomfort – Limited Adaptability |
See on Amazon.com |
ASICS Women’s Gel-Game 9 Pickleball Shoes |
Active players seeking style, agility, and court control in pickleball; particularly suitable for those with narrow feet. | – Stylish Appeal – Agile Performance – True Sizing – Durable Sole – Positive Traction – Compliment Magnet – Narrow Feet |
– Firm Insoles – Limited Support – Short Laces – Plastic Feel – Pronation Needs |
See on Amazon.com |
ASICS Women’s Gel-Game 7 Tennis Shoes |
Pickleball and tennis players seeking stylish comfort and stability on the court. | – Stylish Design – Lightweight Comfort – Stability Assurance – Value for Price – Diverse Sports |
– Inconsistent Sizing – Bruising and Discomfort – Inadequate Arch Support – Narrow Toe Box – Durability Concerns |
See on Amazon.com |
ASICS Women’s Gel-Game 8 Tennis Shoes |
Players seeking comfort, support, and style in their tennis or pickleball footwear. | – Comfort & Support – Stylish Design – Stable Grip – Lightweight Agility – Toe Room – ASICS Brand – Ankle Support – Quick Break-In – Responsive Footwork – Sizing Options |
– Durability Concerns – Narrow Fit – Stiffness – Limited Width Options – Higher Price – Unsuitable for Hard Courts – Mixed Sizing – Style vs Function – Inadequate Breathability – Early Wear |
See on Amazon.com |
ASICS Women’s Gel-Dedicate 7 Tennis Shoes |
Recreational players seeking moderately supportive, durable court shoes for tennis and pickleball. | – Stylish Design – Decent Support – Good Traction – Longevity – Arch Support |
– Stiffness – Narrow Fit – Sizing Issues – Short Laces – Durability Concerns |
See on Amazon.com |
REVIEWS OF MY BEST
ASICS Women’s Gel-RENMA Pickleball Shoes
Best for: Casual pickleball players seeking comfort, support, and style for enhanced gameplay and court activities.
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Classic Look and Comfort: Stylish design with comfortable wear for extended periods and court activities. Supportive Profile: Offers stability and support on the court, enhancing gameplay performance. Game Improvement: Alleviates foot pain and fatigue, enhancing enjoyment and performance in pickleball. Appealing Aesthetics: Attractive style and color suitable for both court activities and casual walks. Positive Performance: Successful transition to a specialized court shoe for improved pickleball gameplay. No Break-in Required: Comfortable fit right out of the box for immediate use in indoor and outdoor play. Arch Support: Provides effective arch support, catering to individuals with high arches. Lightweight and Stylish: Lightweight feel with a modern design suitable for both indoor and outdoor sports. | Narrow Toe Box: Toe area too narrow, causing discomfort and potential issues for a wide foot. Inadequate Flexibility: Lacks flexibility and give, leading to discomfort during pickleball play. Premature Wear: Quality concerns with visible wear and tear after only a few weeks of use. Sizing Issues: Some users experience sizing problems, leading to dissatisfaction with fit. Limited Durability: Doubts arise about the durability, especially in comparison to established brands. Unsuitable for Wide Feet: Narrow fit may not be suitable for those with wider feet. Stiffness and Discomfort: Initial stiffness and discomfort experienced, potentially requiring a break-in period. Limited Adaptability: Shoes stick to the court, causing falls and potential safety concerns during play. |
REVIEW
The court shoes under consideration have sparked a spectrum of opinions from various buyers. It’s evident that the initial impressions were positive for some, with their great classic look and a promising fit as described. Several reviewers praised their comfortable wear during extended periods of standing and their perceived compatibility with court activities.
However, the consensus isn’t entirely favorable. A notable concern emerged for those engaging in pickleball. Some encountered issues with the lack of flexibility, leading to discomfort and pain during play. Despite attempts to adjust the fit through lacing alterations and added insoles, these attempts yielded only marginal relief for some users. This discomfort eventually prompted them to seek alternative options, such as the KSwiss pickleball shoes, which reportedly provided a more satisfactory experience for their feet.
Another point of contention revolves around the perceived quality of these court shoes. Disappointment was expressed by a user who noticed premature wear and tear after only a few weeks of use. This raised questions about the durability of the product, particularly in comparison to other established athletic shoe brands. These concerns echo louder given the reputation associated with the brand in question.
The level of support offered by these court shoes drew mixed responses. While some users felt adequately supported and appreciated the shoe’s profile on the court, others found themselves facing discomfort and pain. Even attempts to address this issue through the use of additional insoles did not yield a wholly positive outcome for all users.
In the realm of pickleball, these court shoes exhibited a potential game-changer for an individual who had been grappling with foot pain and fatigue while using less specialized athletic shoes. These shoes seemed to alleviate the problem, significantly improving their overall gameplay experience.
The fit of these court shoes appears to be a central concern for many. Several users found the toe box to be narrow, leading to discomfort even among those who didn’t consider themselves to have wide feet. There were also instances of incorrect sizing leading to an overall dissatisfaction with the fit.
The aesthetics of the shoes garnered approval from some quarters. Their style, color, and appearance were positively highlighted, making them an appealing choice for casual walks and court activities.
In conclusion, the court shoes in question present a mixed bag of experiences and opinions from buyers. While some users found them to be comfortable, supportive, and well-suited for court activities, others encountered discomfort, issues with sizing, and premature wear. These divergent viewpoints underscore the complexity of choosing athletic footwear that caters to a wide range of individual preferences and needs.
ASICS Women’s Gel-Game 9 Pickleball Shoes
Best for: Active players seeking style, agility, and court control in pickleball; particularly suitable for those with narrow feet.
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Stylish Appeal: Vibrant colors and modern design make a fashion statement. Agile Performance: Enhances court control, quick stops, and starts for active players. True Sizing: Accurate fit, accommodating both regular and narrow foot profiles. Durable Sole: Sturdy construction for lasting wear during intense play. Positive Traction: Improved grip for confident movements on pickleball court. Compliment Magnet: Draws admiration with eye-catching aesthetics. Narrow Feet: Ideal for those with narrower foot dimensions. | Firm Insoles: Limited cushioning might be uncomfortable for some. Limited Support: Insufficient arch support, necessitating extra insoles for certain needs. Short Laces: Shoelaces might fall short, especially in extra lace holes. Plastic Feel: Some find the material too hard and lacking flexibility. Pronation Needs: Inadequate support for severe pronation cases. |
REVIEW
The featured shoes have certainly caught the attention of a diverse group of buyers, each sharing their unique perspectives. The unanimous sentiment seems to be that these shoes exude an undeniable charm and style right from the start. According to the consensus, there’s no grueling breaking-in period required, a factor that undoubtedly contributes to the overall appeal.
In terms of fit, buyers have a mix of opinions. While some mention that the shoes run slightly narrow in the toe box, it appears that this concern was more anticipation than actuality for most. The majority affirm that the fit remains true to their regular shoe size, offering a comfortable and accommodating experience. The narrower design seems to particularly resonate with those who have narrower feet, as they find it to be an ideal match.
However, the praise for the shoes isn’t without its considerations. A common thread in the reviews is the slightly firm and plastic feel of the shoes. While firm insoles are generally appreciated, these shoes seem to have missed the mark for a subset of buyers, who express a desire for more substantial padding. This leads to varying opinions on support—while some find the shoes to provide sufficient stability, others indicate the need for additional insole support, especially for those with pronation concerns.
In terms of performance, the shoes have found favor among those who frequent the pickleball court and seek reliable traction. Buyers remark positively on the enhanced control during sudden stops and starts, attributing this improved agility to the shoes’ design. The sturdiness of the sole is also highlighted, meeting the needs of those who require durability during play.
Aesthetically, the vibrant color palette of the shoes receives resounding praise. The bold color choice evokes a sense of happiness and vibrancy, making a strong visual statement. Moreover, the shoe’s dimensions, including width and length, have struck a chord with many. Reports suggest that the sizing is on point, with some even finding them to run a tad larger than anticipated.
As with any product, there are some minor drawbacks. The shoelaces, albeit a small detail, have garnered attention for being on the shorter side, especially when utilizing the extra shoelace holes. However, this issue seems to be easily remedied for some buyers who have opted to replace the black laces with white ones, resulting in an improved aesthetic.
All things considered, the consensus leans towards the positive aspects outweighing the minor drawbacks. The shoes are deemed worthy of consideration due to their undeniable style, an accommodating fit for many foot types, and commendable performance on the court. While some buyers may opt to enhance support with personal insoles, the overall impression is one of satisfaction and readiness to embrace these shoes for active pursuits.
ASICS Women’s Gel-Game 7 Tennis Shoes
Best for: Pickleball and tennis players seeking stylish comfort and stability on the court.
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Stylish Design: Eye-catching color combinations and aesthetic appeal enhance on-court presence. Lightweight Comfort: Lightweight build ensures agility and comfort during gameplay. Stability Assurance: Provides good stability, suitable for pickleball and tennis players. Value for Price: Offers value with comfort, especially considering its affordable price point. Diverse Sports: Suited for tennis and pickleball; versatile for various court sports. | Inconsistent Sizing: Reported issues with sizing accuracy, leading to discomfort and returns. Bruising and Discomfort: Uncomfortable fit caused bruising and pain for some users. Inadequate Arch Support: Thin insole lacking sufficient arch support for extended play. Narrow Toe Box: Toe area felt cramped and narrow for wider feet. Durability Concerns: Some users noticed premature sole wear and concerns about long-term durability. |
REVIEW
The ASICS tennis shoe garnered mixed reactions from its diverse range of buyers. While some expressed satisfaction and comfort, others found themselves disappointed and even in discomfort.
For a number of buyers, the shoe’s aesthetic appeal was undeniable. Its design and color combinations were appreciated, with some describing it as stylish and visually pleasing. However, such positive impressions often gave way to concerns about the shoe’s functionality and overall construction.
A recurring issue centered around sizing and fit. Several purchasers mentioned that they had ordered their usual size but struggled to even get their feet into the shoes. This inconsistency in sizing left many disappointed and questioning the accuracy of the product’s sizing chart. The discomfort stemming from incorrect sizing was a significant source of frustration, leading some to return the product altogether.
Beyond sizing issues, the shoe’s internal structure raised alarms. Multiple buyers shared experiences of discomfort and pain after wearing the shoes. Bruised feet, crunched sides, and soreness were common complaints, leading some to conclude that the shoe’s design was inherently flawed. Even passing the shoes to others didn’t alleviate the problem; one buyer’s mother experienced the same discomfort and limp after a short period of wear.
On the other side of the spectrum, a handful of customers did find the shoe satisfactory for their athletic pursuits. Some noted its lightweight feel and comfortable fit, while others praised its stability during sports like pickleball and tennis. These buyers seemed to appreciate the value they received for the price, describing the shoes as good for their purpose.
However, even among those who found the shoe generally comfortable, issues persisted. Complaints about inadequate arch support and a thin insole were common, leading to doubts about the shoe’s long-term wearability and suitability for prolonged use.
In conclusion, the ASICS tennis shoe elicited a range of responses from its buyers. While some admired its visual appeal and suitability for specific sports, many faced sizing discrepancies, discomfort, and doubts about its overall design and construction. The reviews present a divided perspective, with both positive and negative experiences shaping the product’s reputation among consumers.
ASICS Women’s Gel-Game 8 Tennis Shoes
Best for: Players seeking comfort, support, and style in their tennis or pickleball footwear.
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Comfort & Support: Offers comfortable fit and good support for court sports. Stylish Design: Stylish appearance that appeals to fashion-conscious athletes. Stable Grip: Provides stable grip on the court for confident movement. Lightweight Agility: Lightweight construction aids agility and quick movements during play. Toe Room: Ample toe room for comfort during extended matches. ASICS Brand: Trusted ASICS brand known for quality in athletic footwear. Ankle Support: Offers ankle stability, reducing the risk of injuries. Quick Break-In: Comfortable from the start, minimal break-in required. Sizing Options: Available in various sizes catering to different foot types. Responsive Footwork: Supports precise footwork and swift direction changes. | Durability Concerns: Some users experienced premature wear and tear, questioning long-term durability. Narrow Fit: Not suitable for wider feet, leading to discomfort for some users. Stiffness: Stiff construction restricts natural movement on the court. Limited Width Options: Limited width options might not accommodate all foot types. Higher Price: Pricier than alternatives with similar features. Unsuitable for Hard Courts: Grooved sole design can be problematic on hard courts. Mixed Sizing: Some users reported sizing discrepancies between pairs. Style vs Function: Stylish design might sacrifice functional aspects for looks. Inadequate Breathability: Limited breathability might cause discomfort during prolonged use. Early Wear: Reports of early tearing or splitting in the upper material. |
REVIEW
The ASICS tennis and pickleball shoe has garnered a range of opinions from its users. Some customers have expressed disappointment with their experiences, citing concerns about the shoe’s durability and fit. A few users have reported encountering issues such as premature wear and tear, with the shoes developing holes or splits after only a short period of use. This aspect has left them dissatisfied, particularly considering the investment in an ASICS product.
In terms of fit and comfort, opinions vary. While some have found the shoe to be comfortable and well-fitting, accommodating their needs on the court, others have highlighted problems with sizing and width. Some users with wider feet have found the shoe to be too narrow, leading to discomfort during play. This discrepancy in fit has influenced the overall perception of the product’s quality, causing a level of frustration among those seeking the perfect fit for their activities.
On the positive side, several buyers have praised the ASICS tennis and pickleball shoe for its supportive features. Many have noted its good grip on the court, providing stability and aiding in their footwork during matches. The shoe’s lightweight nature has also been appreciated by those who prioritize agility and ease of movement. Additionally, the brand’s reputation for heel support and ample toe room has drawn favor from certain users who are looking for both comfort and performance in their court shoes.
The shoe’s design and style have received mixed reviews. While some buyers appreciate the stylish appearance of the shoe, others have noted that its appearance is outweighed by concerns about functionality. For instance, the shoe’s stiffness has been criticized by a few users who feel that it restricts their movement and agility on the court. This feedback underscores the importance of striking a balance between aesthetics and performance in a sports shoe.
In summary, the ASICS tennis and pickleball shoe has elicited a range of responses from its purchasers. While some buyers have been pleased with its comfort, support, and grip on the court, others have encountered issues with durability, fit, and overall performance. The shoe’s mixed reviews highlight the diverse experiences that users have had, underlining the need for careful consideration of individual preferences and requirements when choosing the right footwear for tennis or pickleball.
ASICS Women’s Gel-Dedicate 7 Tennis Shoes
Best for: Recreational players seeking moderately supportive, durable court shoes for tennis and pickleball.
| PROS | CONS |
|---|---|
| Stylish Design: Appealing appearance with color options. Decent Support: Provides moderate support for tennis and pickleball. Good Traction: Offers reliable grip on court surfaces. Longevity: Durable construction, lasting through rigorous play. Arch Support: Suitable for individuals with high arches. | Stiffness: Initial rigidity might lead to discomfort. Narrow Fit: Some users find them uncomfortably narrow. Sizing Issues: Shoes may run small, requiring size adjustments. Short Laces: Inadequate lace length can be inconvenient. Durability Concerns: Premature wear on the outsole reported. |
REVIEW
The ASICS Women’s Gel-Dedicate 7 Tennis Shoes have garnered a mixed reception among buyers, with opinions varying widely across different aspects of the product. While some purchasers appreciated the stylish appearance of these court shoes, they found that their initial comfort and support were compromised. Several reviews noted that the shoes felt stiff and lacked flexibility, which resulted in discomfort during play. This stiffness also extended to the ankle support, leaving some customers dissatisfied with the level of support provided.
Durability was a point of contention, as some buyers expressed frustration with the relatively short lifespan of these shoes. One user reported that the bottoms showed significant wear after just a couple of months, which was disappointing compared to the longevity of other brands they had tried. However, others found the shoes to be resilient, especially on the court’s surface, making them suitable for tennis and pickleball.
Comfort was another aspect that garnered mixed feedback. While some buyers praised the comfort and support of the Gel-Dedicate 7 Tennis Shoes, particularly for individuals with specific foot conditions like high arches, others experienced discomfort and even pain. Some noted that the shoes felt narrow, causing discomfort in the toe area, and required additional adjustments like arch supports and heel pads to achieve a satisfactory fit.
Sizing and fit discrepancies were also mentioned, with complaints about the shoes running small or narrow. A few reviewers recommended going up a half size or even a full size to ensure a comfortable fit. The issue of sizing extended to the length of the laces, as some found them to be too short, prompting them to use reserve pairs of laces.
Despite the mixed feedback, there were positive reviews highlighting the strengths of the ASICS Gel-Dedicate 7 Tennis Shoes. Some users praised their traction on the court and the overall support they provided during pickleball play. Additionally, several buyers commended the compatibility of the shoe’s design with various tennis outfits.
In summary, the ASICS Women’s Gel-Dedicate 7 Tennis Shoes exhibit a range of strengths and weaknesses as observed by verified buyers. While some appreciate the shoes’ support, comfort, and durability, others have encountered issues with sizing, discomfort, and premature wear. As with any product, individual preferences and requirements play a significant role in shaping the overall impression of these court shoes.
